Grenzprobleme of Phenomenology: Metaphysics

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract With the publication of Husserliana series and Heidegger’s Gesamtausgabe both nearing completion, a strikingly different picture their work than was available to earlier generations is emerging. It has become quite clear that phenomenological philosophy not fixed “system” but an ongoing philosophical practice much contribute debates in contemporary generally. would be impossible here canvass all “horizons” phenomenology this situation opened up, so chapter I will focus on one issue Husserl considered Grenzproblem his phenomenology, namely, relation between transcendental-phenomenological method (the “reduction”) metaphysics. Section 1 presents overview my understanding transcendental as concerned specifically with clarifying issues normatively structured meaning ( Sinn ). 2 argues metaphysically neutral considers ambiguity Husserl’s Ideas suggests possibility it actually metaphysical idealism – specifically, claim real things “depend” consciousness for existence. 3 takes up three accounts dependence-question only them full account own views Finally, section 4, argue “monadology” based dialectical arguments rather evidence, suggest thus becomes antinomical mirror-image Theodore Sider’s realism.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Metaphysics and Phenomenology: A Relief for Theology

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JST...

متن کامل

Metaphysics of Logical Realism

با اینکه اغلب به غلط تصور می­شود که فلسفۀ تحلیلی، به عنوان یک جنبش ضد-متافیزیکی، هیچ ارتباطی با متافیزیک ندارد، اما دلایل خوبی وجود دارند که بر اساس آن می­توان تمایلات متافیزیکی فیلسوفان تحلیلی را تصدیق نمود و متعاقباً ماهیت ضد-متافیزیکی فلسفه تحلیلی را در تمام مراحل شکل­گیری­اش به حداقل رساند. چون فلسفه تحلیلی یک جنبش تاریخی است که ماهیت اصلی آن در چند مرحله شکل یافته است، لذا با پیگیری این مرا...

متن کامل

Humean metaphysics versus a metaphysics of powers

The paper considers the opposition between Humean metaphysics and the metaphysics of powers, focusing on laws, probabilities and causation. It argues that within Humean metaphysics, everything is a matter of contingency. Consequently, there is no deep metaphysical difference between a deterministic world and a world in which only probabilistic laws hold. This position is contrasted with the fou...

متن کامل

Metaphysics of science between metaphysics and science

The paper argues that metaphysics depends upon science when it comes to claims about the constitution of the real world. That thesis is illustrated by considering the examples of global supervenience, the tenseless vs. the tensed theory of time and existence, events vs. substances, and relations vs. intrinsic properties. An argument is sketched out for a metaphysics of a fourdimensional block u...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Contributions to phenomenology

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2215-1915', '0923-9545']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26074-2_9